[Gluster-users] warning: pure path resolution

Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.com
Wed Jun 15 14:29:13 UTC 2011

On 06/15/2011 10:23 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:16:02AM -0400, Joe Landman wrote:
>> As a general rule, the W simply tells you its a warning.
> In practice, is it safe to simply ignore all warnings from Gluster?
> Different projects have different thresholds between no warning, warning,
> and critical messages. Is Gluster's, in your experience, such that warnings
> may as well be discarded?
> Whit

Ok ... Warnings shouldn't be ignored, just logged. In most cases, they 
will turn out to be nothing.  In some cases, they may turn out to be 
something.  I'll defer to the devs, but our experience suggests that 
warnings that don't develop into E states are things you don't have to 
worry about.

Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics Inc.
email: landman at scalableinformatics.com
web  : http://scalableinformatics.com
phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121
fax  : +1 866 888 3112
cell : +1 734 612 4615

More information about the Gluster-users mailing list